Please discuss around topic of employer (regular employment) seeking to force jab and/or test and/or wearing of face cloth (without medical evidence from doctor for exception…despite there being non medical rationale exemptions), on i, the man’s, estate (legal fiction).

i, understand there is the option to leave such a non harmonious relationship, but can we discuss as if such continued employed is otherwise desired.

Might it be best to approach from a perspective that such action(s) might cause i, harm (escalate via Notice to possible trespass etc. as required to the man or woman who sometimes acts as CEO etc.), by way of coercion, extortion, threat, barattery (as appropriate) which might cause harm to i, a man, via loss of money (and any other 'benefits') to pay bills, food etc. and harm to other property of i, wife, son and/or daughter etc. for similar reasons (or perhaps direct via wife, son and/or daughter to add pressure – class action of sorts). Alternatively, do we approach it via the 'legal', regarding breach of employment contract (assuming no breach for gross misconduct etc. or specific terms allowing the taking of such action, on the estate). i guess i, could use their legal framework if advantageous (Employment Act, ACAS etc. in the UK), but there would be limitations in terms of time limits within which to bring claim, compensation payable, and must be employed for at least 2 years to inure such 'benefit', and likely supportive of any government legal code, Act or Statute which might support such man dating. Further, the property of i, suffering harm, wife, son and/or daughter, would have no cause of action under their 'legal' framework.

So I think the way to go would likely be via the law for mankind, the law of i, by establishing the harm which would be caused if such action were to be taken, or employment contract terminated for refusing said orders. i, consider it would be useful for the community, at this time, for a discussion process around this please.