Current Questions

To vote for a question, click on the question and then click the thumbs up. You may also leave a public comment in the question.

Use the fields below to help you find the most relevant questions. Refresh the page if you need the search form and it is not showing below.

Vote count is updated every few minutes.

You can also submit a new question here.

  • Keyword Search

  • Reset

My Comment/Thoughts #6 Impossible Situation – Legal becomes law when you agree to it I vaguely recall you (Greg Paul) indicating during one of the Implemention Sessions (i think) – that the universe will give us what seems like an impossible situation. Well, I received my ‘impossible situation’ in 2023. My dad passed away about 10 years ago. Prior to that he sold a large piece of land. In March of 2023 my brother, sister and I were contacted by the lawyer of the couple that purchased a large portion (not all of the land). The lawyer more or less asked my sister and I to sign a waiver stating that we were ‘okay’ with letting my brother act on our behalf in settling a descrepancy in the prior land sale – and that the legal fees would be covered by the couple that bought the land. Even though the sale of the land was complete years ago, apparently my dad neglected to transfer the deed for some of the parcels over to the new owners. I procrastinated for months with no response (for no good reason other than that I simply wanted to enjoy the beautiful summer weather) – not spend all my somewhat limited free time hunched over a computer studying LFM. The simplest most loving thing for me to do (i think – in hind site) would have been to sign the waiver immediately, thank and trust my brother and the lawyer to act with honor, and let legal become law – so to speak. It was my dad’s contract after all – not mine. I didn’t want to though, because it entailed taking on a title, etc. It did not occur to me until it was too late that all I had to do (if i wanted to act as a woman and not take on a legal title) was draft a few simple correspondence letters with the same message to remove the controversy and offer remedy – one to the couple that bought the land, one to the woman who at times acts as court staff and one to the man who was acting as lawyer – stating something like i, a woman, born on NN/NN/NNNN to the man ______ agree that the deed to parcel numbers 123 and 456 should be transferred to Bob and Betty. Instead, I waited until a couple of days before the court date then signed and returned the waiver – to avoid having to go to court. I learned my lesson the hard way. Law needs to be expressed.

Votes: 1

Comments: 0

My Comment/Thoughts #5 Beauty in the Beast I have worked in Customer Technical Support for 20 plus years or so at a company that sells online products to the legal society. The way I see it the influence of corporations, governments and other legal fiction society entities pervades nearly every aspect of our society and culture. It seems to me that we need to be cognizant of opportunities that allow any man or woman (who also acts as an employee) to act in good conscious (while they are working in a legal fiction society job at a corporation, government and/or other legal fiction society entity) – particularly in those situations when the policies or procedures that are part of their job have the potential to result in the eventual infliction of harm (direct or otherwise). What I mean is that the role that each individual employee plays in and of itself might not result in harm to a man or a woman, but a series of consecutive actions by separate individuals playing different roles in the entire process can and does have the potential to result in harm. For example, let’s say (hypothetically) someone in tech support resets a customer’s password so that the customer can access a database that allows them to investigate an individual. The data they find could have been collected by any of the countless methods of data collection and surveillance systems in society. So if each of the three actions in this hypothetical scenario (resetting the password to allow database access, using the accessed data to investigate an individual, and collecting data with or without one’s consent) are isolated – no harm is done. However, once the investigation is complete, the results allow the holder of the information to take a 4th action – an action that might result in harm to one or more of those of mankind. Some might assess the scenario with the conclusion that it’s the order followers at the end of the chain – (law enforcement, medical professionals, etc) that bare the brunt of the blaim. But the way I see it, from a bird’s eye view, it’s the process (not each step in isolation) that is most harmful because it connects each of these seemingly inocuous actions (1) providing access to data, (2) data investigation, (3) data collection (surveillance products/procedures) and (4) potential harmful action against the free will of mankind. The process of connecting these actions is made possible in large part by computer technology, but ultimately, within a corporation, government and/or other legal fiction society entity, it is the managers and directors that create the policies and procedures (within their sphere of power and influence in their organization) – policies and procedures that have the potential to result in harm (outside their sphere of power and influence). If a man or woman, who at times acts as an employee, can demonstrate or communicate that the man or woman who at times acts as manager or director is aware of the potential (and likely) eventual harm that could result from requiring employees to implement a particular process, follow a policy, support a product or provide a service then the man or woman, who at times acts as an employee can (1) utilize the correspondence and notice process to connect with the man or woman who at times acts as manager or director as needed to remove controversy, to seek remedy and to remain in honour with love and compassion – and (2) confirm any trespass brought forward by those of mankind (who also at times ast as employees) that is in violation of law and to grant the associated request for remedy so that those of mankind can return to honor I often ponder hypothetical scenarios like the one above trying to find ways to minimize the eventual harm. If each and every man or woman who at times acts as an employee, manager, director, etc. did likewise then we just might (in time) be able to see more glimpses of beauty in the beast.

Votes: 0

Comments: 0

i have been following the notice and claim process as outlined in the trainings; the mankind acting in the legal society ignore & mock my notices and claim process; how do i actually hold the court of i, so they receive invitations (summons) to the court of i and so at that court my orders can be made effective? I have not yet found a court that will allow me to press my claim therein; i believe once i figure out how to successfully press claim for trespass that i will be able to live free and responsible as my creator intends.

Votes: 17

Comments: 0

My Comment/Question #3 Healthy Lifestyle Choices vs. Health Insurance My general understanding is that the legal society ‘requires’ health insurance for employees – and that if one elects not to purchase health insurance then the government imposes a fine and/or penalty. So, to avoid controversy (and the penalty/fine), I have purchased health insurance every year of my adult life during which I was ’employed’, but I have not actually ‘used it’ for the past 3 decades or so. If I am not well, I simply listen to my intuition as to how to bring about healing (i.e fresh air, sunshine, exercise, better diet/lifestyle habits, etc.) Going forward, when I begin to earn sufficient compensation for my labor instead of income for my job, I hope to simply stop purchasing health insurance. I would prefer to give donations to those of mankind who at times teach others how to bring about narural healing. This seems to be a more honorable approach. What are your thoughts on this topic?

Votes: 6

Comments: 0

My Comment/Question #2 – – Credit Freeze – Fraud Alerts – Identity Theft Protection I vaguely recall you (Greg Paul) indicating in one of the other LFM courses – I think it was either the Private Life Blueprint or the Lessons in Law – that it is prudent for those of mankind to keep our monopoly piece in good standing so to speak – for those occasions when we are acting within the legal society framework. In other words, anything that is associated with our Social Security Number, credit rating, etc. What are your thoughts on the pros and cons of contacting the credit reporting agencies to put a freeze on our credit file, to request extended fraud alerts or to purchase identity theft protection?

Votes: 2

Comments: 0

My Comment/Question #1 – Fingerprint ‘Requirement’ – Types of Trespass? I work in technical support at a company that sells online products to those in the legal society. The man who at times acts as my manager informed me recently that one of the upcoming ‘requirements’ of employees will be to provide our finger prints. My initial response was a verbal conversation with my manager – a short statement to the effect that i am a woman who at times acts as an employee and that the body of i is the property of i, exclusive of all others. To protect said property, i: a woman do not agree to provide my finger prints. He has not mentioned the topic since then so perhaps this was sufficient to dissolve the controversy. If he does so later on, then (if necessary) I will perhaps submit a written correspondence and/or notice (to the man or woman who at times acts as HR manager perhaps) that goes into more detail – somthing along the lines of … i, state that i, wish not to accept any order of you, or any order of those acting under your authority now or in the future to submit to any forced application of material on or into the body of i, specifically the finger tips of i for the purpose of creating prints that are accessible to the company and/or the legal society. i, state that i, consider any forced application of material on or into the body of i, specifically the finger tips of i for the purpose of creating prints to be a choice and believe this may cause i, harm; i, state that any attempt to force and/or coerce i, to apply material on or into the body of i, specifically the finger tips of i for the purpose of creating prints will be seen as trespass by way of harm; My question is, if hypothetically (though unlikely), the company ends my employment as a result of my refusal to provide my finger prints – then how could I define the trespass at that point in any subseqent correspondence or notice – would it be by way of extortion, or some other term? Several lawful terms associated with the various types of trespass were provided in the LFMKS. It would be helpful to have a comprehensive list of these terms so that when I find the need to remove controversy and/or request/provide remedy in various circumstances I can more readily and accurately define the type of trespass. In a similar vein, is it sufficient to simply state that i consider some action to be a trespass (period)? What I mean is – it is necessary to follow the word ‘trespass’ with the phrase ‘by way of…’ ?

Votes: 2

Comments: 0

Load More

Report

Harassment or bullying behavior
Contains mature or sensitive content
Contains misleading or false information
Contains abusive or derogatory content
Contains spam, fake content or potential malware

Block Member?

Please confirm you want to block this member.

You will no longer be able to:

  • Mention this member in posts
  • Message this member
  • Add this member as a connection

Please note: This action will also remove this member from your connections and send a report to the site admin. Please allow a few minutes for this process to complete.

Report

You have already reported this .