i, understand why lawful and legal should not be mixed, however i, intend to bring a claim upon a wo/man who sometimes acts as a judge. Said wo/man is in trespass against family of i, trespass leading to child-trafficking, human-trafficking, and much financial harm. The only way that i, can see to press my claim with hope for remedy from said wo/man, or to press the claim to a jury, would be for i, to claim this wo/man has violated their oath of office, leading to violations of constitutional rights of daughter of i. i, understand what Jon said ,”judge did not make that oath to us”, however the oath is to uphold the constitution, (US) which is the law of the land. When one’s claim involves issues in legal, contracts, courts, etc. why would not a wo/man in law common to i, be free use legal as a tool to prove their claim as evidence that a trespass has occurred