where lawformankind overlaps with legal society? i hold my court to protect the ‘without capacity’ sister of i from vaccination by her care home, i will have to present evidence/make argu-ment on vaccine safety/efficacy won’t i???& so be reduced to persuading an inherently biased, most likely vaccinated magistrate/jury with cognitive dissonance not to vaccinate her – an impossible task is it not?, how is this different from going through legal society with evidence/argu-ment – can i just say she is my property leave her alone (there is no mr or mrs taxpayer)without giving evidence and argument on pros/cons of vax?